Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 783 F.2d 110 - Roberts v. Heckler

Roberts v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

783 F.2d 110 · 1985

Citation profile

68
cited by 68 later decisions
January 2009
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 11 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently January 2009 · most notably Roe v. Chater (1996), Thomas v. Sullivan (1991)

23 federal appellate · 11 district ·

420198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baugus v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Smith v. Heckler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is sufficient if it sets forth the impairments which are accepted as true by the ALJ.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must set forth all of the claimant's disabilities when posing a hypothetical question to [an] expert,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.