Domar Ocean Transportation Ltd Division of Lee-Vac Ltd v. Independent Refining Company’s Empirical Analysis
783 F.2d 1185 · 1986
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently June 2017 · most notably Portis v. First National Bank of New Albany (1994), Denise Arguello Alberto Govea Gary Ivory Anthony Pickett Michael Manuel Escobedo Martha Escobedo v. Conoco Inc (2000)
11 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on The Conqueror · Noritake Co. v. M/V Hellenic Champion · International Harvester Credit Corporation and International Harvester Company v. East Coast Truck and R. v. Sales, Inc., East Coast Truck and R. v. Sales, Inc. v. International Harvester Company · Delta Steamship Lines, Inc. v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc. · Jimenez v. Tuna Vessel "Granada"
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'depends on whether the parties recognized that an issue not presented by the pleadings entered the case at trial'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Among the factors considered to determine whether acts are within the scope of employment are: (1) the time, place and purpose of the act; (2) its similarity to acts which the servant is authorized to perform; (3) whether the act is commonly performed by such servant; (4) the extent of departure from normal methods; (5) the previous relations between the parties; and (6) whether the master would reasonably expect that such an act would be performed.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When issues not raised by the pleading are tried by express or implied consent of the parties, they shall be treated in all respects as if they had been raised in the pleadings. Such amendments of the pleadings as may be necessary to cause them to conform to the evidence and to raise these issues may be made upon motion of any party at any time, even after judgment; but failure, so to amend does not affect the result of the trial of these issues.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.