Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 783 F.2d 1371 - Guerra v. Sutton

Guerra v. Sutton’s Empirical Analysis

783 F.2d 1371 · 1986

Citation profile

79
cited by 79 later decisions
3
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

46 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 79 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably Act Up!/Portland v. Bagley (1992), Mendocino Environmental Center v. Mendocino County (1999)

46 federal appellate · 6 district · 3 state decisions

24019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Payton v. New York · Baker v. McCollan · Davis v. Scherer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 79 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “ma[k]e inquiry as to the nature and scope of [the] warrant,”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “require[ ] cooperation and division of labor,”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““(1) when the judgment will serve a useful purpose in clarifying and settling the legal relations in issue, and (2) when it will terminate and afford relief from the uncertainty, insecurity, and controversy giving rise to the proceeding.” Bilbrey by Bilbrey v. Brown, 738 F.2d 1462, 1470 (9th Cir.1984).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.