Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 783 F.2d 1382 - United States v. Fields

United States v. Fields’s Empirical Analysis

783 F.2d 1382 · 1986

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
July 2005
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently July 2005

14 federal appellate · 1 district ·

120198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1708 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 510

Relies on Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · United States v. McConney · United States v. Wilson · Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth · Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company v. Pueblo of Santa Ana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “neither to a new trial nor to multiple punishment”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[I]t is currently possible for a thief to steal a Treasury check endorsed by a payee, endorse his own name and obtain the proceeds, and not violate section 495. In addition, it is possible for a thief to steal one or more government checks or bonds from the rightful owner and sell them to a middle man and not violate section 495 ____ Section 511 [renumbered section 510(b)] would ____ penalize whoever buys, sells, exchanges, receives, delivers, retains, or conceals a stolen United States security or one that bears a forged endorsement or signature knowing that the security is stolen or bears such an endorsement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.