Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 783 F.2d 1428 - United States v. Bogart

United States v. Bogart’s Empirical Analysis

783 F.2d 1428 · 1986

Citation profile

144
cited by 144 later decisions
9
states following
April 2023
most recently cited

89 federal appellate · 5 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 144 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably United States v. Schlei (1997), United States v. Bonanno (1988)

89 federal appellate · 5 district · 16 state decisions

71019861990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 843 (§ 403 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 844 (§ 404 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Rochin v. People of California · United States v. Russell · Sorrells v. United States · Olmstead v. United States · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 144 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “police conduct involv[ing] unwarranted physical, or perhaps mental, coercion”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “engineer and direct the criminal enterprise from start to finish”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “conduct constitutes, in effect, the generation by police of new crimes for the sake of pressing criminal charges against the defendant,”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.