Fiester v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis
783 F.2d 1474 · 1986
Citation profile
41 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably Fuller v. Mg Jewelry (1991), Mt. Graham Red Squirrel v. Madigan (1992)
41 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Provenzano v. United States · Wolfsohn v. Hankin · Sierra On-Line, Inc. v. Phoenix Software, Inc. · Hoohuli v. Ariyoshi · Rodgers v. Watt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A timely appeal is required to vest this court with jurisdiction.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““ ‘Courts will permit an appellant to maintain an otherwise untimely appeal in unique circumstances in which the appellant reasonably and in good faith relied upon judicial action that indicated to the appellant that his assertion of his right to appeal would be timely, so long as the judicial action occurred prior to the expiration of the official time period such that the appellant could have given timely notice had he not been lulled into inactivity.’ ” (Quoting Willis v. Newsome, 747 F.2d 605, 606 (11th Cir.1984)).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he order is appealable but reviewable only for abuse of discretion in denying the motion for reconsideration--not for error in the underlying judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.