United States v. Cheama’s Empirical Analysis
783 F.2d 165 · 1986
Citation profile
19 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently June 2017
19 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 4241 · 18 U.S.C. § 4246 · 18 U.S.C. § 4247
Relies on Singleton v. Wulff · Hormel v. Helvering · New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer · Smith v. Harmsen · Greenwood v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) such a State will assume such responsibility; or (2) the person’s mental condition is such that his release, or his conditional release under a prescribed regimen of medical, psychiatric, or psychological care or treatment would not create a substantial risk of bodily injury to another person or serious damage to property of another;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.