Morris Simpson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 13 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “a description of ... (III) the single standard to be employed in determining income and resource eligibility for [the medically needy], and the methodology to be employed in determining such eligibility, which shall be the same methodology which would be employed under the [SSI] program in the case of groups consisting of aged, blind or disabled individuals in a State in which such program is in effect.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 724 F. Supp. 404 - Mowbray v. Kozlowski · 659 F. Supp. 1309 - ME. ASS'N OF INTERDEPENDENT NEIGHBORHOODS v. Petit

2. “may be ascertained only when the amount produced by the [MBU] methodology is compared against the [MNIL] standard”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Sneede v. Kizer R Sneede · Curtis Sneede, by His Guardian Ad Litem Georgia Thompson Justin Thompson, by His Guardian Ad Litem Georgia Thompson Georgia Thompson, on Her Own Behalf and as Representative of Her Sons Curtis Sneede and Justin Thompson v. Kenneth Kizer, Director, California Department of Health Services California Department of Health Services Jesse R. Huff, Director, California Department of Finance California Department of Finance, Defendants-Third-Party-Plaintiffs-Appellants Curtis Sneede, by His Guardian Ad Litem Georgia Thompson Justin Thompson, by His Guardian Ad Litem Georgia Thompson Georgia Thompson, on Her Own Behalf and as Representative of Her Sons Curtis Sneede and Justin Thompson v. Kenneth Kizer, Director, California Department of Health Services California Department of Health Services Jesse R. Huff, Director, California Department of Finance California Department of Finance v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary, United States Department of Health & Human Services Department of Health & Human Services, Third-Party-Defendants. Curtis Sneede v. Kenneth Kizer California Department of Health Services Defendants-Third-Party-Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant

3. “and must comply with the requirements imposed by the Act itself and the Secretary of Health and Human Services.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 724 F. Supp. 404 - Mowbray v. Kozlowski