Turner’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2002
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Harris v. McRae · Schweiker v. Gray Panthers · Schweiker v. Hogan · Mason County Medical Ass'n v. Knebel · Adams v. Federal Express Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(c) The agency must deduct the following amounts, in the following order, from the individual's total income including amounts disregarded in determining eligibility: 30 * * * 31 * * * 32 (2) For an individual with only a spouse at home, an additional amount for the maintenance needs of the spouse. This amount must be based on a reasonable assessment of need but must not exceed the higher of-- 33 (i) The more restrictive income standard established under Sec. 435.121; or 34 (ii) The medically needy standard for an individual.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.