Quinn v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis
783 F.2d 776 · 1986
Citation profile
112 federal appellate · 22 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 238 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably United States v. Saccoccia (1995), United States v. Khan (1993)
112 federal appellate · 22 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3077 · 18 U.S.C. § 3184 · 18 U.S.C. § 3186 · 18 U.S.C. § 3282 · 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1251 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1253 (§ 243 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Baker v. Carr · Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore · Singleton v. Wulff · Ker v. State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 238 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'extradition proceedings are not to be converted into a dress rehearsal for trial' and 'whether the resolution of the contested issue would be appreciably advanced by the requested discovery.'”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[Habeas corpus review] is not a means for rehearing what the magistrate already has decided. The alleged fugitive from justice has had his hearing and habeas corpus is available only to inquire whether the magistrate had jurisdiction, whether the offence charged is within the treaty and, by a somewhat liberal extension, whether there was any evidence warranting the finding that there was reasonable ground to believe the accused guilty.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crudo v. Ramon · Sandhu v. Bransom“[t]he doctrine of 'specialty' prohibits the requesting nation from prosecuting the extradited individual for any offense other than that for which the surrendering state agreed to extradite.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Benitez v. Garcia · State v. Pang
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.