United States v. Jb Stringfellow’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 2002
4 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · United States v. McConney · Houltin v. United States · Trbovich v. United Mine Workers · Bowsher v. SmithKline Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the applicant’s motion must be timely; (2) the applicant must assert an interest relating to the property or transaction which is the subject of the action; (3) the applicant must be so situated that without intervention the disposition of the action may, as a practical matter, impair or impede his ability to protect that interest; and (4) the applicant’s interest must be inadequately represented by the other parties.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“we are guided primarily by practical considerations”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“confers an unconditional right to intervene.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.