Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 783 F.2d 841 - United States v. Brewer

United States v. Brewer’s Empirical Analysis

783 F.2d 841 · 1986

Citation profile

67
cited by 67 later decisions
13
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

38 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 139 Ill. 2d 264 - People v. Enis (1990), United States v. Rahm (1993)

38 federal appellate · 17 state decisions — followed in 13 states

4001986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act)

Relies on San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · United States v. Downing · United States v. Amaral · United States v. Marabelles · United States v. Vasquez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[However,] the defendant must show, by clear and convincing evidence, 'the prejudice ... caused by the court's failure to appoint an expert [or investigator]'.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “We are unable to see how the use of the magnifying glass to view photographs differs from the use of corrective eyeglasses by jurors”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “requires the court to authorize defense services for indigent defendants 'when the defense attorney makes a timely request in circumstances in which a reasonable attorney would engage such services for a client having the independent financial means to pay for them.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.