Barnes v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
783 F.3d 1185 · 2015
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1819 · 12 U.S.C. § 1821 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · United States v. Winstar Corp. · Hall v. Bellmon · Sutton II v. Utah State School for the Deaf and Blind 1-5 1-5
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a tax refund due from a joint return generally belongs to the company responsible for the losses that form the basis of the refund.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“only enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face ... to nudg[e his] claims across the line from conceivable to plausible ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“consistent with the requirement that shareholders not circumvent the interests of creditors and the FDIC”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Zucker v. Rodriguez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.