Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 783 F.3d 1276 - Standley v. Edmonds-Leach

Standley v. Edmonds-Leach’s Empirical Analysis

783 F.3d 1276 · 2015

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. Sanders · Delaware v. New York · United States v. Sanchez-Robles · Musser v. Gentiva Health Services · Jimmy Searles v. Durward a Van Bebber - United States of America -

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] party must, without awaiting a discovery request, provide to the other parties ... the name and, if known, the address and telephone number of each individual likely to have discoverable information — along with the subjects of that information — that the disclosing party may use to support its claims or defenses, unless the use would be solely for impeachment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.