Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

783 F.3d 763

Docket No. 14-55671.

Carlwig v. Carlwig

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued and Submitted March 2, 2015.

Filed April 17, 2015.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2015-04-17

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2020

3 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on 16 F. Supp. 3d 1075 - Carlwig v. Carlwig

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2015-04-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Matthew' A.' Fitzgerald (argued), Christopher Trible, and Lauren Woods, McGuireWoods LLP, Richmond, VA; Leslie M. Werlin, Dana Palmer, Molly White, Blake Olson, and True Nguyen, McGuire-Woods LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

¶2Philip D. Parrish (argued), Philip D. Parrish, P.A., Miami, FA; Lawrence S. Katz, Miami, FA, for Defendant-Appellee.

¶3Erin C. Smith, Nancy K.D. Lemon, and Jennafer Dorfman Wagner, Berkeley, CA; Donald M. Falk, Mayer Brown LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Amici Curiae Family Violence Appellate Project, California Women’s Law Center, Legal Momentum, Women’s Law Project, and Professor Jane Stoever.

¶4Before: Harry Pregerson, Ferdinand F. Fernandez, and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges.

¶5ORDER

¶6Sarah Carlwig appeals the decision and order of the district court sending A.L.C. and E.R.S.C., dual-national American and Swedish children, to Sweden pursuant to the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (the “Convention”), and its implementing legislation, the International Child Abduction Remedies Act, 22 U.S.C.A. §§ 9001-11. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

¶7We hereby vacate the portion of the district court’s order, Carlwig v. Carlwig (In re A.L.C.), 16 F.Supp.3d 1075 (C.D.Cal.2014), concerning the habitual residence of E.R.S.C.

¶8IT IS SO ORDERED.

/783/f3d/763 · .json · Public domain