Chevron Corp. v. Donziger’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1503 · 18 U.S.C. § 1512 · 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1782 · 28 U.S.C. § 455
Relies on Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation · Liteky et al United States · Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc. · Washington v. Harper · American Steamship Owners Mutual Protection & Indemnity Ass'n v. United States Lines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Court's comments from the bench on various occasions ... upon which the [defendant] Representatives rely— ... are wholly innocuous when read in context....”); Bin-Wahad v. Coughlin, 853 F.Supp. 680, 686 (S.D.N.Y.1994) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Donziger I”) (granting preliminary injunction); Chevron Corp. v. Donziger, No. 11 Civ. 0691 (LAK), 2011 WL 979609 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 7, 2011) ("Donziger II”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Berlinger § 1782 II”); In re Chevron Corp., 749 F.Supp.2d 135 (S.D.N.Y.) ("Donziger § 1782 I”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.