Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 783 P2D 1154 - Fox v. Alascom, Inc.

Fox v. Alascom, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
December 1997
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Dandridge v. Williams · Dickinson v. Auto Center Manufacturing Co. · Alaska Brick Company v. McCoy · Fox v. Alascom, Inc. · W. R. Grasle Co. v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Notice of an injury or death in respect to which compensation is payable under this chapter shall be given within 30 days after the date of such injury or death to the board and to the employer. [[Image here]] (d) Failure to give notice does not bar a claim under this chapter (1) if the employer, an agent of the employer in charge of the business in the place where the injury occurred, or the carrier had knowledge of the injury or death and the board determines that the employer or carrier has not been prejudiced by failure to give notice; (2) if the board excuses the failure on the ground that for some satisfactory reason notice could not be given; (3) unless objection to the failure is raised before the board at the first hearing of a claim for compensation in respect to the injury or death.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “An appellee who does not wish a change in the decree appealed from is not required to cross-appeal in order to preserve his right to urge errors in a district court's ruling that would, if accepted by the appellate court, support an affirmance of the appealed decree.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.