Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 783 SO2D 108 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 33 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Engle v. Isaac · Ake v. Oklahoma · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Estelle v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A finding of no manifest injustice under the `plain error' standard on a direct appeal serves to establish a finding of no prejudice under the test for ineffective assistance of counsel provided in Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “`whether "the sentencer . . . would have concluded that the balance of aggravating and mitigating circumstances did not warrant death.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`[A] finding of no plain error is one factor to consider when assessing the performance of counsel.' Fortenberry [v. State ], 659 So.2d 194 , 200 (Ala.Cr.App. 1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 846 , 116 S.Ct. 137 , 133 L.Ed.2d 84 (1995), quoting Hallford [v. State ], 629 So.2d 6 , 10 (Ala.Cr.App. 1992), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1100 , 114 S.Ct. 1870 , 128 L.Ed.2d 491 (1994). `”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.