Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

783 So. 2d 1120

Docket No. 1D01-385.

Palma v. State

Raymond PALMA, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-03-15

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2007

5 state decisions

Relies on 780 So. 2d 834 - Amend. to Fla. Rules of Appellate Proc.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-03-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Raymond Palma, pro se, appellant.

¶2Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4In response to an order to show cause regarding the timeliness of his appeal, Raymond Palma argues he did not receive notice of entry of the order until after the time for timely filing a notice of appeal had passed. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction without prejudice to Palma's right to file a petition for belated appeal with this court which complies with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) (formerly Rule 9.140(j), see Amendments to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure,780 So.2d 834 875 (Fla.2000)).

¶5BARFIELD, C.J., ALLEN and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

/783/so2d/1120 · .json · Public domain