Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

783 So. 2d 1122

Blum v. Blum

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-03-21

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2017

1 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Relies on 632 So. 2d 130 - Winkelman v. Toll

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-03-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the final judgment of dissolution of marriage in all respects, finding no merit in any of the points raised by the former wife. As to the issue of the determination that the former husband would be responsible for some portion of the wife’s attorney’s fees, we are without jurisdiction, and therefore dismiss without prejudice. See Winkelman v. Toll, 632 So.2d 130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994).

POLEN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
/783/so2d/1122 · .json · Public domain