783 So. 2d 288 - Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 260 So. 2d 198 - Costello v. State · 536 So. 2d 226 - Lopez v. State · 428 So. 2d 369 - N.U., Inc. v. T & R Seafood, Inc. · Onnestad v. State · Gore v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Good cause has been found to exist where the defendant demonstrates `that his previously tendered guilty plea was infected by misapprehension, undue persuasion, ignorance, or was entered by one not competent to know its consequence or that it was otherwise involuntary, or that the ends of justice would be served by withdrawal of such plea.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The withdrawal of a guilty plea is not a matter of right, but ... a question addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Acee v. State“The trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that Davis failed to sustain his burden of proving good cause....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.