Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

783 So. 2d 293

Docket No. 5D00-2797.

State v. Barber

STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Ann Elliott BARBER, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 16, 2001.

Rehearing Denied May 2, 2001.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2001-03-16

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably 817 So. 2d 963 - Moore v. Correctional Medical Services (2002), Thomas v. State, Department of Revenue (2011)

34 state decisions

Applies FL 90 § 90.404

Relies on 110 So. 2d 654 - Williams v. State · 520 So. 2d 250 - State v. Pettis · Richardson v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-03-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann M. Phillips, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney Generals, Daytona Beach, for Petitioner.

¶2Gregory W. Eisenmenger, Robert R. Berry of Eisenmenger & Berry, P.A., Melbourne, for Respondent.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The State petitions for certiorari review of an order suppressing Williams rule evidence. See Williams v. State,110 So.2d 654 (Fla.1959), codified atFla. Stat. § 90.404(2) (1999). We have jurisdiction. See State v. Pettis,520 So.2d 250, 253 (Fla.1988); see also Richardson v. State,706 So.2d 1349 (Fla.1998); State v. Smith,586 So.2d 1237 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

¶5We grant the petition, quash the order excluding evidence of the collateral offense involving Baby Devin, and remand for further proceedings in light of our decision in Barber v. State,781 So.2d 425 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001).

¶6WRIT GRANTED.

¶7COBB, PETERSON and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.

/783/so2d/293 · .json · Public domain