Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 783 SO2D 501 - State v. Knightshed

State v. Knightshed’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · 412 So. 2d 1313 - State v. Robicheaux · 759 So. 2d 961 - State v. Wickem · 703 So. 2d 63 - State v. Winfrey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Three factors are considered in reviewing a trial court's sentencing discretion: 1) the nature of the crime; 2) the nature and background of the offender; and 3) the sentence imposed for similar crimes by the same court and other courts. The issue on appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion, not whether another sentence might have been more appropriate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.