783 So. 2d 566 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2010
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on DeGennaro v. Furr · 630 So. 2d 1278 - State v. Robertson · 776 So. 2d 376 - State v. Anthony · 377 So. 2d 96 - State v. Shelton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(2) The juror is not impartial, whatever the cause of his partiality. An opinion or impression as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant shall not of itself be sufficient ground of challenge to a juror, if he declares, and die court is satisfied, that he can render an impartial verdict according to the law and the evidence;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(3) The relationship, whether by blood, marriage, employment, friendship, or enmity between the juror and the defendant, the person injured by the offense, the district attorney, or defense counsel, is such that it is reasonable to conclude that it would influence the juror in arriving at a verdict[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.