783 So. 2d 769 - Henderson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 735 So. 2d 1099 - Colenburg v. State · 633 So. 2d 978 - Puckett v. Stuckey · 440 So. 2d 318 - Mason v. State · Robinson v. State · 638 So. 2d 1305 - Roussel v. Hutton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Facts asserted to exist must and ought to be definitely proved and placed before [the Court] by a record, certified by law; otherwise, we cannot know them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Day v. State“The Mississippi Supreme Court has consistently held that decisions are based on the `facts shown in the record, not assertions in the brief.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Day v. State“When no proper record is submitted, this Court will not place the trial court in error based merely upon assertions in appellant's brief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Day v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.