783 So. 2d 771 - Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2002
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 440 So. 2d 297 - Groseclose v. State · McFee v. State · 551 So. 2d 188 - Benson v. State · 665 So. 2d 852 - Eakes v. State · 428 So. 2d 1361 - Pearson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the trial court judges the legal sufficiency, as opposed to the weight of the evidence on a motion for a directed verdict, the trial court is required to consider evidence introduced in the light most favorable to the State and accept as true all of the evidence introduced at trial by the State, including all reasonable inferences that may be drawn therefrom.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Only when the verdict is so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence that to allow it to stand would sanction an unconscionable injustice will this Court disturb it on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.