Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 783 SW2D 691 - State v. Daniels

State v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 1991
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Angelina County v. McFarland · Peurifoy and Thomason v. Wiebusch · Neuhoff Bros., Packers v. Acosta · Perez v. Los Fresnos State Bank · South Padre Development Co. v. Realty Growth Investors

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) In Criminal Cases — Ordinary Timetable. The transcript and statement of facts shall be filed in the appellate court within sixty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or the order appealed from has been signed, if a motion for new trial is not filed. If a timely motion for new trial is filed, the transcript and statement of facts shall be filed within one hundred twenty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or the order appealed from has been signed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.