Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 784 F.2d 1077 - Adams v. James

Adams v. James’s Empirical Analysis

784 F.2d 1077 · 1986

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
3
states following
September 2013
most recently cited

35 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently September 2013 · most notably Smith v. Maschner (1990), White v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc. (1990)

35 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

3201986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wolff v. McDonnell · Perry v. Sindermann · Elrod v. Burns · Hudson v. Palmer · Bounds v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “pleadings [were] broad enough to encompass such a theory”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.