Debreceni v. Outlet Co.’s Empirical Analysis
784 F.2d 13 · 1986
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 2013
3 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1364 (§ 4064 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1381 (§ 4201 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1384 (§ 4204 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1401 (§ 4221 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1461 (§ 4402 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. RA Gray & Co. · Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation · Scheck v. Francis · Canaras v. Lift Truck Services, Inc. · Iam National Pension Fund Benefit Plan v. Stockton Tri Industries
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an earlier date if the contract was a written validation of an already existing and partially performed agreement. ARCO's Letter Agreement represents precisely such an arrangement. Because it is undisputed that Mr. Finley did not acquire interest in the minerals until March 1, 1989, his claimed injuries may not arise out of the 1989 Agreement and instead must stem from an injury received during his ownership of the property. 11 In his response to ARCO's summary judgment motion, Mr. Finley argued for the first time that his claim was based on ARCO's general”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Staff of Joint Committee on Taxation, 98th Cong., 2d Session, General Explanation of the Revenue Provisions of the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, at 893 (1985) (General Explanation) 7 The issue is not only whether an employer”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“doctrine, under which equity requires that a contract be deemed executed as of the moment the contract was offered. 7 However, as Professor Williston notes with respect to that doctrine, which is now largely discredited,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.