Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 784 F.2d 1313 - McClelland Engineers, Inc. v. Munusamy

McClelland Engineers, Inc. v. Munusamy’s Empirical Analysis

784 F.2d 1313 · 1986

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
July 1995
most recently cited

10 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 28 U.S.C. § 1404

Relies on Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno · Lauritzen v. Larsen · Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co. · Ohio State Board of Education v. Reed

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the 'vessel' is not a 'true maritime vessel' but rather an 'unconventional' vessel, such as a platform or a rig, ... the place of the wrongful act, the allegiance or domicile of the injured, and the place of contract take on 'added significance.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that each 'factor's' significance is sufficiently obscure or variable to justify any judicial conclusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.