Brand v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis
784 F.2d 1515 · 1986
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently July 2001
10 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Picard v. Connor · National Organization for Women, Inc. v. Idaho · Walker v. United States · McKaskle v. Vela · Westbrook v. Zant
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[f]ailure to enumerate all instances of attorney error [in state court proceedings] does not preclude appellate review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.