United States v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis
784 F.2d 188 · 1986
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently May 2020 · most notably United States v. Walton (1990), United States v. Blakeney (1991)
33 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Glasser v. United States · Kotteakos v. United States · Cupp v. Naughten · Roberts v. Louisiana
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We do not hold that under any and all circumstances in every case where the words 'polygraph examination' are mentioned, a grant of a new trial would be required.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“This Circuit holds an introduction of polygraph material to be error.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.