Mack v. Rumsfeld’s Empirical Analysis
784 F.2d 438 · 1986
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 2019
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rostker v. Goldberg · Crawford v. Cushman · Katcoff v. Marsh · 609 F. Supp. 1561 - MacK v. Rumsfeld
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in light of the intervening Supreme Court opinion in Rostker [ ],”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doe v. Shanahan
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.