Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 784 F.2d 984 - Colley v. Sumner

Colley v. Sumner’s Empirical Analysis

784 F.2d 984 · 1986

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
2
states following
April 2010
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently April 2010 · most notably Walters v. Maass (1995), Terrovona v. Kincheloe (1988)

23 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions

2301986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Chapman v. State of California · Blockburger v. United States · Brown v. Ohio · Iannelli v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “admission of the testimony was arbitrary or fundamentally unfair.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The testimony was especially probative of identity because ... it .... suggest[ed] that [the defendant] possessed a unique modus operandi.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “described a modus operandi similar in other respects to the one alleged”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.