Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 784 F.2d 993 - Smith v. Block

Smith v. Block’s Empirical Analysis

784 F.2d 993 · 1986

Citation profile

108
cited by 108 later decisions
December 2014
most recently cited

85 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 108 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably Kruso v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. (1989), Ascon Properties, Inc. v. Mobil Oil Co. (1989)

85 federal appellate · 1 district ·

7301986199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 7 U.S.C. § 1981A

Relies on Warth v. Seldin · Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc. · Allen v. Wright · Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization · Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of Bellwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 108 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n reviewing a district court decision, we may affirm on any ground finding support in the record”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.