Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 784 F.2d 996 - Dres v. Campoy

Dres v. Campoy’s Empirical Analysis

784 F.2d 996 · 1986

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
2
states following
January 2005
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently January 2005

17 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

130198619902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Pointer v. Texas · California v. Green · Sumner v. Mata · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A witness is not 'unavailable' for purposes of the ... exception to the confrontation requirement unless the prosecutorial authorities have made a good-faith effort to obtain his presence at trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[W]e review de novo the question of whether the Supreme Court's standards for unavailability have been satisfied in this case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[e]vidence of former testimony is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the declarant is unavailable as a witness and ... (2) [t]he party against whom the testimony is offered ... had the right and opportunity to cross-examine the declarant with an interest and motive similar to that which he has at the hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.