Ruiz v. Donahoe’s Empirical Analysis
784 F.3d 247 · 2015
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
June 2024
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 3
Relies on Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp. · Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co. · Kontrick v. Ryan · United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Mitchell · Henderson v. Shinseki
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“mandatory grievance and arbitration procedures in contracts ... are waivable [they] do not affect this court's subject-matter jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Subject-matter jurisdiction properly comprehended refers to a tribunal's power to hear a case, and can never be forfeited or waived.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A]greements to arbitrate implicate forum selection and claims-processing rules[,] not subject matter jurisdiction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.