Cantu v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis
784 F.3d 253 · 2015
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2020
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1112 · 11 U.S.C. § 1115 (§ 321 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 363 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Relies on Norwest Bank Worthington v. Ahlers · Avellino & Bienes v. M. Frenville Co. · S.V. v. R.V. · Luling Oil & Gas Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co. · Grady v. Ah Robins Company Incorporated
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.