United States v. Procknow’s Empirical Analysis
784 F.3d 421 · 2015
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 287 · 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Livestock Fraud Protection Act) · 26 U.S.C. § 7602 · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Hoffa v. United States · Illinois v. Rodriguez · United States v. Caceres · United States v. National Bank · Samson v. California
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.