Bohus v. Restaurant.com, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
784 F.3d 918 · 2015
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson · William Marbury v. James Madison · Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona · Tigner v. Texas · Montells v. Haynes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We cannot disregard the legislature's choice to award statutory damages in the absence of actual damages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a civil penalty of not less than $100.00 or ... actual damages, or both at the election of the consumer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the defense is 'apparent on the face of the complaint' and documents relied on in the complaint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.