Petersen v. RIVERTON CITY’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 2012
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738
Relies on Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. Doe · San Remo Hotel L.P. v. City and County of San Francisco · Boyd v. Brown · Neilson v. Anthony D'Angelis · Teigen v. Renfrow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Federal courts [must] give preclusive effect to any state-court judgment that would have preclusive effect under the laws of the State in which the judgment was rendered.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.