Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 784 NE2D 532 - Wehry v. Daniels

Wehry v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
September 2006
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lewis v. Hughes · Quaney v. Tobyne · Cargill Inc., Commodity Marketing Division v. Hale · Hochstedler v. St. Joseph County Solid Waste Management District · 153 Ga. App. 1 - Jackson v. Meadows

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “unless clearly erroneous, and due regard shall be given to the opportunity of the trial court to judge the credibility of the witnesses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “informal, with the sole objective of dispensing speedy justice between the parties according to the rules of substantive law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “judgments in small claims actions are 'subject to review as prescribed by relevant Indiana rules and statutes.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.