Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 784 NW2D 264 - Swanson v. Brewster

Swanson v. Brewster’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
4
states following
October 2025
most recently cited

1 district · 23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on American Family Insurance Group v. Schroedl · Robinson v. Bates · Schmidt v. Clothier · Van Tassel v. Horace Mann Insurance Company · 229 Ill. 2d 393 - Wills v. Foster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “payments made pursuant to the United States Social Security Act.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “is that the tortfeasor, as a wrongdoer who caused a particular harm, should not benefit from a tort plaintiff's ability to secure other compensation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “for which a subrogation right has been asserted”). It is undisputed that no subrogation rights were reserved. . The district court found”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.