Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 784 P2D 1066 - Feely v. Davis

Feely v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2019
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently December 2019

5 state decisions

601989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on DENCO BUS LINES, INC. v. Hargis · Middlebrook v. Imler, Tenny & Kugler, M.D.'s, Inc. · Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Rosamond · Spaeth v. Union Oil Co. · Midkiff v. Luckey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “whenever possible, that litigating parties be allowed their day in court so that a decision on the merits may be reached.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.