Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 784 P2D 218 - Van Patten v. Van Patten

Van Patten v. Van Patten’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
3
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Nussbacher v. Manderfeld · Stryker v. Rasch · Rohrbaugh v. Mokler · State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Meeker · Soppe v. Breed

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Possession of real property by a person other than the vendor is notice to the purchaser of whatever rights or interests, legal or equitable, in the fee which the occupant has or claims and which would be disclosed on a proper and reasonable inquiry of him. Indeed, such possession is notice of all facts in reference to the title which due and diligent inquiry of the occupant would disclose. Therefore possession is notice of the rights of those under whom the possessor claims.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “No reasonable inquiry whatsoever was made to determine the occupants’, appellants’, claims of right. * * * [[Image here]] * * * Possession by others puts the subsequent claimant on notice and requires reasonable investigation of the rights of such possessors.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.