Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 784 P.2d 788 - People v. Trujillo

People v. Trujillo’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

1 district · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently December 2018 · most notably People v. Matheny (2002), People v. Gennings (1991)

1 district · 35 state decisions

260199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Rhode Island v. Innis · Berkemer v. McCarty · California v. Beheler · Minnesota v. Murphy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The time, the place and purpose of the encounter; the persons present during the interrogation; the words spoken by the officer to the defendant; the officer’s tone of voice and general demeanor; the length and mood of the interrogation; whether any limitation of movement or other form of restraint was placed on the defendant during the interrogation; the officer’s response to any questions asked by the defendant; whether directions were given to the defendant during the interrogation; and the defendant’s verbal or nonverbal response to such directions.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “adequately supported by competent evidence.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a reasonable person in the suspect's position would consider himself deprived of his freedom of action in a significant way during a police interrogation in which the suspect was exposed to the risk of self-incrimination.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.