Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 784 SO2D 1091 - Happ v. Moore

Happ v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · Giglio v. United States · Espinosa v. Florida · 615 So. 2d 688 - Spencer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]ppellate counsel cannot be deemed ineffective for failing to raise non-meritorious claims on appeal, or claims that do not amount to fundamental error.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A shoe print found outside the driver's side of the car was later found to match one of Happ's shoes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.