Norris v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2006
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 674 So. 2d 738 - Brown v. State · 697 So. 2d 903 - Neal v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A prosecution on a charge on which the defendant has not previously been arrested or served with a summons is commenced when either an indictment or information is filed, provided the capias, summons, or other process issued on such indictment or information is executed without unreasonable delay. In determining what is reasonable, inability to locate the defendant after diligent search or the defendant's absence from the state shall be considered. The failure to execute process on or extradite a defendant in another state who has been charged by information or indictment with a crime in this state shall not constitute an unreasonable delay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cunnell v. State“defendant is continuously absent from the state or has no reasonably ascertainable place of abode or work within the state.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cunnell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.