Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 687 So. 2d 1253 - Martin v. State · Daniel v. State · 776 So. 2d 206 - Estes v. State · 747 So. 2d 351 - Nix v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘ “The admission by a defendant of a prior conviction constitutes proper proof to enhance that defendant’s sentence under the Habitual Offender Act.” ’ Nix v. State, 747 So.2d 351, 357 (Ala.Crim.App.1999) (quoting Daniel v. State, 623 So.2d 438, 441 (Ala.Cr.App.1993)). ‘When an accused admits prior felony convictions, they are deemed proven for purposes of § 13A-5-9, Code 1975.’ Martin v. State, 687 So.2d 1253, 1256 (Ala.Crim.App.1996) (citations omitted).””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Allen v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.