Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 784 So. 2d 396 - Kight v. State

784 So. 2d 396 - Kight v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 2017
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Espinosa v. Florida · Jones v. State · 622 So. 2d 982 - Huff v. State · Jones v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n instances where the codefendant's lesser sentence was the result of a plea agreement or prosecutorial discretion, this Court has rejected claims of disparate sentencing.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[N]ewly discovered evidence must be of such nature that it would probably produce an acquittal on retrial. The same standard would be applicable if the issue were whether a life or a death sentence should have been imposed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.